Sunday, December 21, 2014

Obama, DeBlasio, Sharpton & Holder Responsible for Execution Murder of Two Cops in New York

While lecturing the police on treatment of blacks they looked the other way as violent protests festered then exploded. How many more will die?

Remember how Obama liked to lecture the Tea Party on rhetoric? After the shooting of Rep. Gabrielle Giffords (D-AZ) [note, the seat was just won by a Republican] Obama told us "it's important for us to pause for a moment and make sure that we are talking with each other in a way that heals, not a way that wounds." Of course that call for civility was one sided as Democrats, including Vice President Biden continued to call Tea Partiers "terrorists."

Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi also used to wag her finger at the Tea Party. She once scolded: "I think we all have to take action and responsibility for our words." Yet when liberal protesters demanded Gov. Scott Walker of Wisconsin (R) be removed from office "dead or alive" we didn't hear a peep about it. On the contrary, she called the Wisconsin protests "an extraordinary show of democracy in action."

In the wake of Grand Jury decision in Missouri Obama gave several speeches in which he had a few throwaway lines about the need to protest peacefully followed by paragraph after paragraph lecturing the police on the treatment of black people. Since then he's said little about the violence and civil unrest which has gripped major cities.

Did we hear Obama condemn the protesters who chanted "what do we want? DEAD COPS?" Not a word. You can imagine his response if the Tea Party did anything similar?

Meanwhile, the violence simmering just below the surface was allowed to fester and finally explode as a man who was directly inspired by the protests and violent rhetoric first shot his girlfriend in the stomach near Baltimore then got in his car and drove to New York City where he gunned down NYPD Officers Wenjian Liu and Rafael Ramos

NYPD Officers Wenjian Liu and Rafael Ramos, killed because
Obama and the left let the monster of racist violence loose!
Just to show how widespread this left wing culture of violence and hate has become, some at the scene shouted:
"Fuck the cops." One witness reported “A lot of people were clapping and laughing,” he said. “Some were saying, ‘They deserved it,’ and another was shouting at the cops, ‘Serves them right because you mistreat people!’” he said.
On Twitter people only celebrated the killing and cheered for the shooter. That's civility on the left!

Oh, Al Sharpton did make a statement decrying violence. But once again, that message is buried in the hate he spouts every day. No word from the White House. In a statement from Attorney General Holder he couldn't help get in a dig accusing cops of being distant from the communities they serve.

New York Mayor DeBlasio showed up at the hospital where the dead officers were taken and attempted to show he sympathized with the police. He was shunned by officers at the scene who turned their back to him. Along with Obama and the rest DeBlasio has made it clear he sides with protesters and accuses police of being the bigger problem.

After a short break, Obama, DeBlasio, Sharpton and Holder will go right on placing the blame for unrest on the police with only a few words warning against violence by others. But as the New York Patrolman's Benevolent Association President Patrick Lynch said late Saturday DeBlasio has "blood on his hands." So too for Obama and the rest who stood by and watched this happen!

UPDATE: Video of Obama, Sharpton & Holder Whipping Up Racial Tension

Thanks to a liberal troll for the link to the video. It illustrates what I said, citing original sources, above:

Saturday, December 20, 2014

Obama Unhinged: Politico Finds Obama Out for "Revenge" and Seeks to "Punish" Republicans

Does this sound like the kind of talk you would expect from a guy who claims he wants to work with both sides?

Writing at Politico Glenn Thrush notes that Obama will continue to make "the usual let’s-work-together" noises in press conferences and speeches but behind the scenes, Obama's is engaging in a take no prisoners strategy of confrontation and attack. Nothing new you say, but it is. On issues across the board Obama's stand on things like race, immigration and Cuba policy are more divisive and confrontational than in the past. Obama's got nothing to lose and he's hell bent on doubling down on the politics of attack even when the targets are members of his own party.

Deep down, Obama has always been a Chicago thug politician. In 2010 he told an Hispanic audience that political motivation should be to "punish our enemies..reward our friends." Yet the minute some Republican attacks him you'll hear him whine sanctimoniously about the need for civility in debate and can't we all get along. Then of course whoever criticizes him is a racist!

Obama is signaling that despite the massive GOP win in November he intends to continue ramming through policies that he knows the majority of Americans, as they expressed their will at the ballot box, oppose. He doesn't care. His legacy will be as the most divisive President EVER. As a result expect race relations and the partisan divide to worsen. Not that Obama cares!

Obama Change in Cuba Policy Based on Lies and Betrayal

Has Obama ever met a communist regime he didn't like?

What do you suppose Obama's attitude would be towards a right wing dictatorship that brutally repressed it's own people? He would demand sanctions and the full diplomatic and economic isolation of that regime. Remember South Africa before Mandela if you want an example.

But when it comes to Iran he decided negotiation was the way to go. Iran is still speeding towards getting a nuclear weapon which will further destabilize the Middle East. Obama "reset" relations with Russia and Putin responded by invading Ukraine.

Now, it's Cuba's turn. Team Obama says isolating Cuba hasn't worked so they're throwing in the towel and opening the floodgates to U.S. money. Just what the Cuban communist government needs as Venezuela, which previously subsidized them, is also on the ropes after the collapse of oil prices.

Obama left Cuban Democracy advocates in the cold on his decision. An editorial in the Washington Post titled "President Obama’s ‘betrayal’ of Cuban democrats" says it all:
Guillermo FariƱas, the general director of the dissidents’ United Anti-Totalitarian Front, told reporters in Havana that Mr. Obama had promised in a November 2013 meeting with himself and Ms. Soler that any U.S. action on Cuba “would be consulted with civil society and the nonviolent opposition. Obviously this didn’t happen . . . they didn’t take into account Cuban democrats.”

The negative response from the people whom Mr. Obama portrays as the beneficiaries of his initiative is one reason to question his contention that Cuba should be treated like China and Vietnam, two Communist nations with which the United States normalized diplomatic and economic relations decades ago. The United States was not able to join with opposition movements in those countries in demanding democratic reforms as part of a normalization process because, at the time, such movements barely existed in either place. In Cuba’s case, the opportunity was there.
In Cuba’s case, that means listening to the brave freedom fighters Mr. Obama spurned. Mr. Obama’s prescription was not the only alternative to what he saw as the failed policy of the past half-century. Opposition leaders from throughout the island have agreed on four immediate demands to put before the government: the release of political prisoners; the end of repression against human rights and pro-democracy groups; the ratification of international covenants on human rights; and the recognition of Cuban civil society groups.

Mr. Obama could have linked a step-by-step normalization with Cuba to the regime’s satisfaction of these steps, which stop far short of introducing democracy. Instead he settled for the release of 53 political prisoners — or about half the number that Cuban human rights activists say are held — and a vague promise of greater access to the Internet.
If U.S. policy is really to be revised and refocused on helping the Cuban people, it would be well to promote the changes that their citizen leaders are seeking — not just the ones sought by their totalitarian rulers.
Bipartisan Opposition to Obama Move

Note that Obama threw Cuban democracy activists under the bus and violate his pledge to work with them in the process. He did the same to the U.S. Congress. Members of both parties were appalled by the decision. Senator Bob Menendez (D-NJ), son of Cuban immigrants and outgoing Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee said this deal "stinks."The Senator went on to say ""I think it's wrong. I am deeply disappointed in the president."" Menendez was not consulted which is standard practice and something that Obama again had pledge to do.

Nailing the point about consultations home, in confirmation hearings in November for Tony Blinken who was seeking a top State Department job there was clear promise made to Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL), also the son of Cuban immigrants:
“Do you anticipate, during the rest of the president’s term, that there will be any unilateral change” to sanctions on Cuba absent democratic reforms, asked Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida, whose parents emigrated from Cuba to the U.S.

“Anything that might be done on Cuba will have to be consistent with the law,” Blinken replied. He added, “Anything that in the future might be done on Cuba would be done in full consultation” with Congress.
The day after the Senate voted to confirm Blinken Obama made his announcement. Since this plan was in the works for months it can only be concluded that the Obama Administration lied to Congress. It's not the first time.

Once again, Obama takes unilateral action that only caused more division, even in his own party. It won't help the Cuban people gain their freedom any more than his "reset" of relations with Russia did any good or engagement with Iran. Obama doubles down on stupid and we will regret it!

Washington Post Editorial: Obama's Immigration Move "Unprecendented"

Funny how the news of Obama's unconstitutional unilateral action got buried by other news like Ferguson and Garner. You might almost suspect it was planned!

Neat trick the Obamatons have of burying any unfortunate, embarrassing or politically damaging news stories by putting on an even bigger circus to attract media attention. And of course the media falls for it.

But as the din of the latest outrages subside, I thought we might want to review this editorial from the Washington Post on December 3rd. It's titled "President Obama’s unilateral action on immigration has no precedent." Here's an excerpt:
[I]t is increasingly clear that the sweeping magnitude of Mr. Obama’s order is unprecedented.
This is not a game of gotcha; facts matter — even in Washington — and so do the numbers. Under close scrutiny it is plain that the White House’s numbers are indefensible. It is similarly plain that the scale of Mr. Obama’s move goes far beyond anything his predecessors attempted.
Republicans’ failure to address immigration also does not justify Mr. Obama’s massive unilateral act. Unlike Mr. Bush in 1990, whose much more modest order was in step with legislation recently and subsequently enacted by Congress, Mr. Obama’s move flies in the face of congressional intent — no matter how indefensible that intent looks.

Keep in mind this is the Washington Post, heart and soul of the Washington establishment. It's not Fox New or Rush Limbaugh.

Meanwhile, a federal judge in Pennsylvania has written a decision which finds Obama's action unconstitutional. Legal scholars say the judge overstepped his bounds but why should that matter? After all, isn't that exactly what Obama is doing? Or will the rules of law only apply to Congress and the Judiciary and not the Executive Branch?

Thursday, December 18, 2014

Thanks Obama! Your Policies Have Made the Rich Richer and the Middle Class is Getting Hosed!

Your rich campaign contributors are enjoying their windfall at the expense of everyday Americans!

A new study from Pew Research. Here's the important graph:
Next time some KoolAid drinking lefty tells you Republicans are the party of the rich shove this graph down their throat!

Wednesday, December 17, 2014

New York Liberal Mayor Violates Building Codes to Put Up 10' Fence to Keep the Citizens Away

Republican Mayors Guiliani and Bloomberg were fine with a six foot wall, but not limousine liberal DeBlasio!

Radical New York Mayor DeBlasio bills himself as a man of the people and has also encouraged protests against Police in New York which he calls "peaceful." If the protesters are so peaceful why did the Mayor erect a ten foot fence around the official mayoral residence? And why did he do it without obtaining the permits that every other citizen would be required to obtain?

The New York Post has the story.

Another liberal who hides behind layers of security while tossing the rest of us to the mob!

Man Who Conducted Enhanced Interrogations of KSM Slams Critics and Senate Report

Had the CIA not got the information that saved lives Senate Democrats would also be blaming this guy!

That bogus Senate Dem report on torture has taken up a week's worth of national news. During that time atrocities like the massacre of Muslim schoolchildren in Pakistan seem to less important than the waterboarding of JUST THREE of the very worst terrorists.

Also, that Senate Dem report failed to give anyone at CIA the chance to respond and released names and information which puts their lives at risk. One man, Dr. James Mitchell decided to speak out. Senate Dems never contacted him or allowed him to present his side of the story but he does so in an interview with Megyn Kelly. This is the condensed version with the final part.

If you want to know what really happened to these terrorists that Dems call "torture" watch this and learn:

Now you know why Senate Dems didn't want to hear from Dr. Mitchell or others at CIA. The truth might get in the way of the big lie that the Bush Administration was engaged in widespread torture!

Tuesday, December 16, 2014

One Month After Horrific Attack on Israeli Synagogue Where is International Support for Israeli Restraint?

And where is justice for those who were slaughtered?

When Israel responds to an attack there's an instant call from the West for restraint. Where is the recognition of Israel's restraint following an attack on a Synagogue last month? Where is the call for Palestinian restraint?

Once again, Western leaders look the other way as Muslim mass murderers commit acts of evil. No wonder these attacks are growing in frequency and death toll!

Taliban Monsters Kill 132 Children After Forcing Kids to Watch as Teacher Burned Alive

When will Obama wake up and do something?

The Daily Mail has the story and more pictures here.

One of the injured Pakistani children receiving urgent care.

ISIS Muslim Monsters behead children in Iraq and Syria. Boko Haram in Africa has been kidnapping children and forcing them to marry. All the Obama Administration did was have Michelle Obama and some State Department flunkies send out a tweet saying #bringbackourgirls.

Lone wolf attacks in Canada, New York City, Sydney and elsewhere are on the rise.

Obama's official statement following the attack Tuesday in Pakistan didn't even mention the Taliban. Perhaps because the Obama Administration has been negotiating with the Taliban and naming them as the culprits might get in the way. In the way of what? Justice for the children!

Since the September 11, 2001 attacks, and even further back, there has been a willful blindness on the part of many liberals. They don't want to admit the painful reality of Muslim terrorism and thus bend over backwards to either ignore the facts or, as Hillary Clinton did recently, somehow understand and "empathize" with them.

How do you empathize with monsters that do this to children and innocent people? The only rational course is to kill them before they kill more of us! You cannot negotiate with EVIL!

For a week Democrats have been fretting about a biased report decrying enhanced interrogation of a handful of terrorists during the Bush Administration. Will they allow the waterboarding of JUST THREE Muslim monsters who are alive and well today to eclipse this very real massacre and the need to address solutions to the problem?

Left's Response to Sony Execs Racial Remarks More Hypocrisy on Parade

You can imagine the uproar if a Republican said the same thing!

When Donald Stirling, now former owner of the L.A. Clippers Basketball team made some racist remarks that were leaked to the press liberals went bonkers and Stirling was forced to sell his team and was banned for life. When the emails of Hollywood libs at Sony Pictures were hacked the reaction was rather more muted.

Oprah provides the perfect contrast:
Oprah Winfrey defended Sony chair Amy Pascal on Monday after Pascal's racist comments about President Barack Obama were leaked to the media. "There are things that you say in your private conversations with your friends and with your colleagues that you would not want to be broadcast on CNN," she told CNN's Don Lemon. Yet in April, Oprah blasted former L.A. Clippers owner Donald Sterling for his tape-recorded racist comments.

"We're off the plantation! The plantation days are over!" Winfrey told TMZ, adding that she hoped the Clippers would be bought by Magic Johnson. Sterling was banned for life from the NBA and forced to sell the team.

There is no difference between the Pascal and Sterling cases. Both were victims of allegedly illegal eavesdropping.
The lesson here is that if you're part of the liberal in crowd you can say or do whatever you want and it's OK. If you're a Republican or otherwise unconnected from the rich and powerful left wing elite you'll be made an example as a warning to the rest of us to stay in line. Or, as Oprah would understand, if you don't do as your told, you'll be put back on that plantation!

Monday, December 15, 2014

Obama's Racial Policies Bring Out the Worst as NYC Protesters Call for "Dead Cops"

Imagine Obama's response if the Tea Party behaved like this?

Remember when the Tea Party was labeled as terrorists by top Democrats? Remember when Obama said they needed to behave in a civil manner and watch their language?

So, where is Obama when protesters in New York City chant "What do we want? Dead Cops" over and over and over? Silence!

Here's the video:

In newly released information from the FBI 76 cops were killed by assailants last year. Did you hear about ANY of these murders on the news?

I have an idea. Let's withdraw police from minority neighborhoods for a week and see what happens!
fsg053d4.txt Free xml sitemap generator